Abelson, Robert:

1975. Concepts for representing mundane reality in plans. In: Bobrow – Collins (eds.): Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. New York, Academic, 273-309.

Abraham, W. – de Meij, S. (eds.):

1986. Topic, focus and configurationality. Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Adams, Marilyn – Collins, Allan:

1979. A schema-theoretic view of reading. In: Freedle (ed.): New directions in discourse processing. Norwood, N. J. Ablex, 1-22.

Agar, M.:

1985. Institutional discourse. Text, 5. 147-168.

Al-Khatib, Mahmoud A.:

1997. Provoking arguments for provoking laughter: A case study of the candid camera TV show. Text, 17. 3. 263-299.

Allen, James:

1979. A plan-based approach to speech act recognition. Toronto, University of Toronto, Department of computer science(s) technical report 131/179.

Allén, Sture (ed.):

1982. Text processing. Stockholm, Almquist and Wiksell.

1989. Possible worlds in humanities, arts and sciences. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

Allén, St. –Petőfi, S. J. (eds.):

1979. Aspects of automatized text processing. Hamburg, Buske.

Allwood, J. – Anderson, L. G. – Dahl, Ö.:

1977. Logic in linguistics. Cambridge. London, New York, Melbourne.

Allwood, J. –  Hjelmquist, E. (eds.):

1985. Foregrounding background. Lund, Doxa.

Altehenger, B.:

1996. Forensische Texte. Aspekte einer Explikation der im forensischen Diskurs vorkommenden Texte und ihrer Verarbeitung am Beispiel des Zivilprozessen. Hamburg, Buske.

Anderegg, Johannes:

1977. Literaturwissenschaftliche Stiltheorie. Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, Göttingen.

Andersen, P. – Guerrero, L. (eds.):

1998. Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory applications and contexts. San Diego, Academic.

Anderson, John:

1976. Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum.

1996. Kognitive Psychologie. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg.

Anderson, Richard:

1977. The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise. In: Anderson – Spiro – Montague (eds.): Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum, 415-431.

Anderson, Richard – Spiro, Rand –Montague, William (eds.):

1977. Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum.

Antos, Gerd –Krings, Hans P. (Hg.):

1989. Textproduktion. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

Apel, Karl-Otto (Hg.):

1982. Sprachpragmatik und Philosophie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.

Aquino, Milagros:

1969. The validity of the Miller-Coleman readability scale. Reading Research Quarterly, 4. 342-357.

Arbib, M. a. – Hesse, M. B.:

1986. The construction of reality. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Argyle, Michael:

1972. The psychology of interpersonal behaviour. Penguin.

1986. Social skills and the analysis of situations and conversations. In: Hollins, C. R. – Trower, P. (eds.): Handbook of social skills training. 2. Clinical applications and new directions. Oxford, Pergamon Press, 185-216.

Arnheim, R.:

1969. Visual thinking. Berkeley, Los Angeles, University of California Press.

Asmuth, Bernhard – Berg-Ehlers, Luise:

1978. Stilistik. Westdeutscher Verlag.

Atkinson, M.:

1984. Our masters’ voices. The language and body language of politics. London, Methuen.

Austin, John:

1961. Philosophical papers. Oxford University Press.

1962. How to do things with words. London, Oxford.

Ausubel, David:

1960. The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51. 267-272.

Azar, Moshe:

1997. Concession relations as argumentation. Text, 17. 3. 301-316.

Ballmer, Thomas:

1975. Sprachrekonstruktionssyteme. Kronberg, Scriptor.

Ballmer, Thomas (ed):

1985. Linguistic dynamics. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

Ballmer, Th. – Kindt, W. (eds.):

1980. Zum Thema Sprache und Logik. Ergebnisse einer interdiszciplinären Diskussion. Hamburg, Buske.

Bally, Charles:

1919-21. Traité de stylistique fracaise. Paris.

Bardovi-Harlig, K. – Hartford, B. S.:

1990. Congruence in Native and Nonnative Conversations: Status Balance in the Academic Advising Session. Language Learning, 40. 467-501.

1993. The Language of Comembership. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26. 227-257.

Barnouw, E. et al. (eds.):

1989. International Encyclopedia of Communications, 1-4. New York, Oxford University Press.

Barth, E. M. – Krabble, E. C.:

1982. From axiom to dialogue. A philosophical study of logics and argumentation. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.

Barth, E. M. – Martens, J. L. (eds.):

1982. Argumentation. Approaches to theory formation. Amsterdam, Benjamins.

Barthes, Roland:

1964. Éléments de sémiologie. Editions du Seuil, Paris.

Bartlett, Frederick:

1932. Remembering. Cambridge, England, Cambridge.

Bartsch, Renate:

1985. Sprachnormen: Theorie und Praxis. Max Niemeyer, Tübingen.

Barwise, Jon – Etchemendy, John:

1989. Model-Theoretic Semantics. In: M. Posner (ed.): Foundations of Cognitive Science. MIT Press, 207-244.

Bauman, Richard – Scherzer, Joel (eds.):

1974. Explorations in the ethnography of speaking.London, Cambridge.

Bavelas, J. B. – Rogers, K. E. – Millar, F. E.:

1985. Interpersonal conflict. In: T. A. van Dijk (ed.): Handbook of Discourse Analysis 1-4. Academic Press, London, 4. 9-26.

Beach, R., –Bridwell, L. S. (Eds.):

1984. New directions in composition research. New York, Guilford Press.

Bear, J. M.:

1986. Development segments in discourse: The interaction of topic and cohesion with implications for native and non-native speakers of English. Austin, University of Texas.

Beaugrande, Robert de:

1978a. Factors in a theory of poetic translating. Assen, van Gorcum.

1978b. Information, expectation, and processing. Poetics, 7. 3-44.

1978c. Linguistic theory and composition. College Composition and Communication, 29. 134-140.

1978d. Semantic evaluation of grammar in poetry. Journal of Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature, 3. 315-325.

1979a. Text and sentence in discourse planning. In: Petőfi (ed.): Text versus sentence: basic questions in text linguistics. Hamburg, Buske, 467-494.

1979b. Theoretical foundations for the automatic production and processing of technical reports. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 9. 239-268.

1979c. Toward a general theory of creativity. Poetics, 8. 269-306.

1979d. Psychology and composition. College Composition and Communication, 30. 50-57.

1980a. Text, discourse, and process. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex, London, Longman.

1980b. The status of texts in reading research. In: Tierney, Robert – Anders, Patricia – Mitchell, Judy (eds.): Understanding a reader’s understanding.

1980c. The pragmatics of discourse planning. Journal of Pragmatics, 4. 15-42.

1980d. Towards a semiotics of literary translating. In: Wilss, Wolfram (ed.): Semiotic und Übersetzen. Tübingen, Narr, 23-42.

1980e. Text and discourse in European research. Discourse Processes, 3. 4. 287-299.

1981a. Design criteria for process models ofreading. Reading Research Quarterly, 16.

1981b. Linguistics theory and meta-theory for a science of texts. Text, 1. 2. 113-162.

1984. Text Production: Toward a Science of Composition. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood.

1990. Text linguistics through the years. Text 10. 1-2. 9-17.

1994. Text Linguistics. In: Asher, R. E. (ed.): 1994. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 9. Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York, Tokyo.

Beaugrande, Robert de (ed.):

1980. European approaches to the study of text and discourse. Discourse process, 4. vol. 1.

Beaugrande, Robert de – Colby, Benjamin:

1979. Narrative models of action and interaction. Cognitive Science, 3. 46-66.

de Beaugrande, Robert-Alain –Dressler, Wolfgang U.:

1981. Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

1990. Text linguistics through the years. Text, 10. 9-17.

Beaugrande, Robert de – Miller, Genevieve:

1980. Processing models for children’s story comprehension. Poetics, 9. 181-201.

Beckmann, Frank:

1993. Theorie und Praxis des Lexikons. Einleitung. In: Frank Beckmann – Gerhard Heyer (Hg.): Theorie und Praxis des Lexikons. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 1-12.

Beckmann, Ulrich:

1991. Text und Textwelten: zur Problematik der Bedeutungskonstituierung zu Texten. Hamburg, Buske.

Beerbohm, Max:

1958. Selected essays. London, Heinemann.

Begemann, Petra:

1991. Poetizität und Bedeutungskonstitution: ein Modell poetischer Textverarbeitung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Rolle der Lautäquivalenzen. Hamburg, Buske.

Bellert, Irene:

1970. On a condition of the coherence of texts. Semiotica, 2. 335-363.

Beneš, Eduard:

1986. On two aspects of functional sentence perspective. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague, 3. 267-274.

Bennett-Kastor, T.:

1983. Noun phrases and coherence in child narratives. Journal of Child Language, 10. 135-149.

Benson, J. – Greawes, W. (eds.):

1985. Systemic perspectives on discourse: Selected theoretical papers. Norwood, N. J. Ablex.

1988. Systemic functional approaches to discourse. Norwood, N. J. Ablex.

Benveniste, E.:

1966. Problemes de linguistigue générale. Gallimard, Paris.

Bergeer, Ch. R. – Chaffee, S. H. (eds.):

1987. Handbook of communication science. London, Sage.

Bernstein, Jared – Pike, Kenneth:

1977. The emic structure of individuals in relation to dialogue. In: van Dijk – Petőfi (eds.): Grammars and descriptions. Berlin, de Gruyter, 1-10.

Berry, Margaret:

1977. Introduction to systemic linguistics. London, Batsford.

Bestgen, Yves – JeanCostermans:

1994. Time, Space, and Action: Exploring the Narrative Structure and Its Linguistic Marking. Discourse Processes, 17. 3. 421-446.

Bestgen, Yves – WietskeVonk:

1995. The Role of Temporal Segmentation Markers in Discourse Processing. Discourse Processes, 19. 3. 385-406.

Bettinghaus, E. P.:

1968. Persuasive communication. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Biasci, C.:

1982. Konnective in Sätzen und Texten. Eine Sprachübergreifende pragmatisch-semantische Analyse. Hamburg, Buske.

Biasci, Claudia – Fritsche, Johannes (eds.):

1978. Texttheorie – Textreprasentation: Theoretische Grundlagen der kanonischen sinnsemantischen Repräsentation von Texten. Hamburg, Buske.

Biber, D.:

1992. On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes, 15. 2. 133-163.

1994. An Analytical Framework fo Register Studies. In:Biber, D. – Finegan, E. Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 31-56.

1995. On the role of computational, statistical, and interpretive techniques in multi-dimensional analyses of register variation: A reply to Watson. Text, 15. 3. 341-370.

Bierwisch, Manfred:

1965a. Rezension zu Z. S. Harris, Discourse analysis. Linguistics, 13. 61-73.

1965b. Poetik und Linguistik. In: Kreuzer, Helmut – Gunzenhäuser, Rul (eds.): Mathematik und Dichtung. München, Nymphenburger, 46-66.

1966. Strukturalismus: Geschichte, Probleme, Methoden. Kursbuch, 5. 77-152. Aiso in Ihwe (ed.): Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik: Ergebnisse und Perspektiven. Frankfurt, Athenäum, 1971. 19-90.

1987. Linguistik als kognitive Wissenschaft – Erläuterungen zu einem Forschungsprogramm. Zeitschrift für Germanistik. 6. 645–667.

Bierwisch, Manfred – Lang, Ewald (Hg.):

1987. Grammatische und konzeptuelle Aspekte von Dimensionsadjektiven. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.

Birch, David –O'Toole, Michael (eds.):

1988. Functions of Style. Pinter Publishers, London.

Black, John B. – Bower, Gordon H.:

1979. Episodes as chunks in narrative memory. Joumal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 309-318.

Bloch, Charlotte:

1996. Emotions and discourse. Text, 16. 3. 321-341.

Blom, Jan-Petter – Gumperz, John:

1972. Social meaning in Iinguistic structures: code switching in Norway. In: Gumperz – Hymes (eds.): Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 407-434.

Blumer, Herbert (ed.):

1969. Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, N. J. Prentice-Hall.

Bobrow, Daniel – Collins, Allan (eds.):

1975. Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. New York, Academic.

Bouissac, Paul – Herzfeld, Michael –Posner, Roland (eds.):

1986. Iconicity. Essays on the Nature of Culture. Festschrift for Thomas A. Sebeok on his 65th birthday. Stauffenberg, Tübingen.

Brandt, W. J.:

1970. The rhetoric of argumentation. New York, Irvington.

Braselmann, P. M. E.:

1981. Konnotation – Verstehen – Stil. Operationalisierung sprachlicher Virkungsmechanismen. Frankfurt am Main.

Brazil, D.:

1985. Phonology: Intonation in Discourse. In: T. A. van Dijk (ed.):Handbook of Discourse Analysis .Academic Press, London, Vol. 2. 57-76.

1995. A Grammar of Speech. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Brazil, D. – Coulthard, M. – Johns, C.:

1980. Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching. London, Longman.

Breuer, D.:

1974. Einführung in die pragmatische Texttheorie. München, Fink.

Brindöpke, Christel – Gibbon, Dafydd –Langer, Hagen –Pampel, Martina:

1991. Prosodische Kohäsion. In: G. Rickheit (Hg.): Kohärenzprozesse. Modellierung von Sprachverarbeitung in Texten und Diskursen. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 137-181.

Brinker, K.:

1992. Linguistische Textanalyse. Eine Einführung in Grundbegriffe und Methoden. Berlin, Erich Schmidt.

2000. Text- und Gesprächlinguistik/Linguistics of Text and Conversation. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung / An international Handbook of Contemporary Research. Zwei Halbbände / Two Volumes. Berlin - New York, de Gruyter. 1. Halbband / Volume 1.

Brown, G. – Yule, G.:

1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Brown, P. – Levinson, St.:

1978. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In: Goody, E. N. (ed.): Questions and politeness. Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 56-232.

Brünner, Gisela – Graefen, Gabriele:

1994. Zur Konzeption Funktionalen Pragmatik. In: Brünner, G. – Graefen, G. (Hg.): Texte und Diskurse. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 7- 24.

Brünner, Gisela – Graefen, Gabriele (Hg.):

1994. Texte und Diskurse. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.

Bull, Willlam:

1968. Time, Tense, and the Verb. University of California Press. Berkeley, Los Angeles.

Burghardt, Wolfgang – Hölker, Klaus (eds.):

1979. Text Processing – Textverarbeitung. Berlin, de Gruyter.

Bühler, Karl:

1934. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Fischer, Jena.

Bybee, Joan L.:

1985. Diagrammatic iconicity in stem-inflection relation. In: J. Haiman (ed.): Iconicity in Syntax. John Benjamins. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 11-47.

Camarazza, Alfonso – Grober, Ellen –Catherine –Yates, Jack:

1977. Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Be, 16. 601-609.

Canale, M.:

1983. From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In: J. C. Richards – R. W. Schmidt (szerk.): Language and Communication. London, Longman, 2-27.

Carlson, L.:

1985. Dialogue games. An approach to discourse analysis. Dordrecht, Reidel.

Carroll, Lewis:

1960. The annotated Alice: Alice’s adventures in Wonderland and through the looking-glass. New York, Potter.

Cassirer, Peter:

1975. On the Place of Stylistics. Haokan Ringbom et al. (eds): Style and Text – Studies Presented to Nils Erik Enkvist. Skriptor AB, Stockholm, 27-48.

Catford, John:

1964. A linguistic theory of translation. London, Oxford.

Celce-Murcia, M. – Dörnyei, Z. – Thurell, S.:

1995. Communicative Competence: A Pedagogically Motivated Model with Content Specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6. 5-35.

Chafe, Wallace:

1970. Meaning and structure of language. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

1972. Language and memory. Language, 49. 462-485.

1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In: Li (ed.): Subject and topic. New York, Academic, 27-55.

1986. Writing in the perspective of speaking. Written Communication Annual, 1. 12-39.

1990. Looking ahead. Text, 10. 1-2. 19-22.

1991. Grammatical subjects in speaking and writing. In: Text, 11. 1. 45-72.

Chafe, Wallace (ed.):

1980. The pear strories (Cognitive, Cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production). Norwood, N. J. Ablex..

Chafe, W. – Nichols, J. (eds.):

1986. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, N. J. Ablex.

Chambers, Jack K.:

1995. Sociolinguistic Theory. Linguistic Variation and its Social Significance. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Chanslor, J. W.:

1969. Treasure from the sea. In: Science and the sea. Washington, D. C. U. S. Naval Oceanographic Office, 9-16.

Chapin, Paul:

1970. Samoan pronominalization. Language, 46. 366-378.

Charles, Michel:

1995. Introduction a l’étude des textes. Seuil. Paris.

Charniak, Eugene:

1975a. A brief on case. Castagnola, Institute for Semantic and Cognitive Studies, Castagnola.

1975b. Organization and inference in a frame-like system of common-sense knowledge. Castagnola, Institute for Semantic and Cognitive Studies, Castagnola.

1976. Inference and knowledge. In: Charniak – Wilks (eds): Computational semantics: An introduction to artificial intelligence and natural language communication. Amsterdam, North Holland, 1-21 and 129-154.

Charniak, Eugene – Wilks, Yorick (eds.):

1976. Computational semantics: An introduction to artificial intelligence and natural language communication. Amsterdam, North Holland.

Charolles, M.:

1983. Coherence as a principle in the interpretation of discourse. Text, 3. 1. 71-98.

Charolles, M. (ed.):

1989. The resolution of discourse: processing coherence or consistency dissonances. Hamburg, Buske.

Charolles, M. – Petőfi, J. S. –Sözer, E. (eds.):

1986. Research in text connexity and text coherence. Hamburg, Buske.

Chatman, Seymour – Levin, Samuel (eds.):

1967. Essays on the language of literature. Boston, Houghton Mifflin.

Chomsky, Noam:

1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MIT Press.

1986. Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use. New York, Praeger.

Christaller, Thomas – Metzing, Dieter (eds.):

1979. Augmented Transition Network Grammatiken. Berlin: Einhorn.

Christensen, Francis:

1967. Notes toward a new rhetoric. New York, Harper – Row.

Clancy, P. M.:

1996. Referential strategies and the co-construction of argument structure in Korean Acquisition. In: Fox, B. (szerk.): Studies in Anaphora. Philadelphia, John Benjamins, 33-68.

Clark, Herbert – Chase, William:

1974. Perceptual coding strategies in the formation and verification of descriptions. Memory and Cognition, 2. 101-111.

Clark, Herbert – Clark, Eve:

1968. Semantic distinctions among memory for complex sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20. 129-138.

1977. Language and psychology. New York, Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.

Clyne, Michael –Bouma, Gary D.:

1994. Talking about one's life and faith: A pilot project on language and religion. Text, 14. 2. 167-184.

Cohen, Philip:

1978. On knowing what to say: planning speech acts. Toronto, University of Toronto. Department of computer science(s) technical report 118.

Colby, Benjamin:

1966. Ethnographic semantics. Current Anthropology, 7. 3-32.

1973a. A partial grammar of Eskimo folktales. American Anthropologist, 75. 645-662.

1973b. Analytical producers in eidochronic study. Journal of American Folklore, 86. 14-24.

Colby, Kenneth – Parkinson, Richard:

1974. Pattem-matching rules for the recognition of naturallanguage dialogue expressions. American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 1. 1-70.

Cole, Peter (ed.):

1978. Syntax and semantics lX: Pragmatics. New York, Academic.

Cole, Peter – Morgan, Jerry (eds.):

1975. Syntax and semantics III: Speech acts. New York, Academic.

Cole, Peter – Sadock, Jerrold (eds.):

1977. Syntax and semantics VIII: Grammatical relations. New York, Academic.

Collins, Alan:

1977a. Processes in acquiring knowledge. In: Anderson – Spiro – Montague (eds.): Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum, 339-363.

1977b. Why cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 1. 1-2.

1978. Fragments of a theory of human plausible reasoning. Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing-2 New York, Association for Computing Machinery, P. O. Box 12105 Church Street Station, New York, NY 10249, 194-201.

Collins, Alan – Loftus, Elizabeth:

1975. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82. 407-428.

Collins, Alan – Quillian, Ross:

1972. How to make a language user. In: Tulving – Donaldson (eds.): The organization of memory. New York, Academic, 309-351.

Collins, Alan – Warnock, Eleanor –Aiello, Nelleke –Miller, Mark:

1975. Reasoning from incomplete knowledge. In: Bobrow – Collins (eds.): Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. New York, Academic, 383-415.

Connor, U.:

1984. Recall of text: Differences between first and second language  readers. TESOL Quarterly, 18. 239-255.

1996. Contrastive rhetoric. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Connor, Ulla –Davis, Kenneth W. – deRycker, Teun:

1995. Correctness and clarity in applying for overseas jobs: A cross-cultural analysis of US and Flemish applications. Text, 15. 4. 457-457.

Connor, U. –Johns, A. M. (eds.):

1990. Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives. Washington, DC: TESOL.

Connor, U. –Kaplan, R. B. (eds.):

1987. Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 texts. Reading, MA. Addison-Welsey.

Conte, M.-E. (ed.):

1987. Kontinuität und Diskontinuität in Texten und Sachverhalts-Konfigurationen. Diskussion über Konnexität, Kohäsion und Kohärenz. Hamburg, Buske.

Conte, M.-E. –Petőfi, J. S. –Sözer, E. (eds.):

1989. Text and discourse connectedness. Proceedings of the conference on connexity and coherence. Urbino, July 16-21. 1984. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Philadelphia.

Cook, G.:

1989. Discourse. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Corbett, Edward:

1971. Classical rhetoric for the modern student. New York, Oxford.

Coseriu, Eugenio:

1956. Determinación y entorno. Romanistisches Jahrbuch, 7. 29-54. Also in Coseriu: Theoría del lenguaje y lingüística general. Madrid, Gredos, 282-323.

1967. Theoría del lenguaje y lingüística general. Madrid, Gredos.

1972. Über Leistung und Grenzen der kontrastiven Grammatik. In: Nickel (ed.): Reader zur Kontrastiven Linguistik. Frankfurt, Athenäum, 39-58.

1981. Textlinguistik. Eine Einführung. Narr, Tübingen.

Coulmas, F.:

1977. Rezeptives Sprachverhalten. Eine theoretische Studie über Faktoren des Sprachlichen Verstehensprozesses. Hamburg, Buske.

Coulthard, Malcolm:

1977. An introduction to discourse analysis. London, Longman.

Coulthard, M. (ed.):

1992. Advances in spoken discourse analysis. London, Routledge.

Coulthard, M. – Montgomery, M. (eds.):

1981. Studies in discourse analysis. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Craik, Fegus –Lockhart, Richard:

1972. A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11. 671-684.

Crowder, Robert – Morton, John:

1969. Precategorical acoustic storage. Perception and Psychophysics, 5. 365-373.

Crymes, Ruth:

1968. Some systems of substitution relations in Modern English. The Hague, Mouton.

Crystal, David:

1969. Prosodic systems of substitution and intonation in English. Cambridge, England, Cambridge UP.

1971. Linguistics. Harmondsworth, Penguin.

1997. The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, David – Davy, D:

1969. Investigating English style. Longman, London.

Cullingford, Richard:

1978. Script application: Computer understanding of newspaper stories. New Haven, Yale Department of computer science(s) technical report, 116.

Cummings, Edward Estlin:

1972. Anyone lived in a pretty how town. In: Complete poems. New York, Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich, 515.

Dahl, Östen (ed.):

1974. Topic and comment, contextual boundness, and focus. Hamburg, Buske.

Dale, R.:

1992. Generating referring expression: Constructing descriptions in a domain of objects and processes. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.

Daneš, Frantisek (ed.):

1974a. Functional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text. Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Series Minor, 147. Prague.

1974b. Papers on functional sentence perspective. Prague, Academia.

1995. The Paragraph – a Central Unit of the Thematic and Compositional Build-up of Texts. In: B. Waevik, S. – K. Tanskanen – R. Hiltunen (eds.): Organization in Discourse. University of Turku, Turku, 29-40.

Daneš, Frantisek –Viehweger, Dieter (eds.):

1976. Probleme der Textgrammatik. Berlin, Akademie der Wissenschaften.

1977. Probleme der Textgrammatik. II. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.

Danks, Joseph – Glucksberg, Sam:

1971. Psychological scaling of adjective orders. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 10. 63-7.

Dascal, Marcelo – Margalit, Avishai:

1974. Text grammars: A critical view. In: Projektgruppe Textlinguistik Konstanz (eds.): Probleme und Perspektiven der neueren textgrmmatischen Forschung I. Hamburg, Buske, 81-120.

Dascal, Marcelo (ed.):

1985. Dialogue. An interdisciplinary approach. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Dascal, M. – Gerhardus, D. –Lorenz, K. –Meggle, G. (eds.):

1992., 1996. Philosophy of language. An international handbook of contemporary research. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

Davis, Steven (ed.):

1991. Pragmatics. A reader. Oxford.

Deane, Paul D.:

1992. Grammar in Mind and Brain. Explorations in Cognitive Syntax. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

Deinhiere, G. – Rossi, J. P.:

1991. Text and text processing. Amsterdam, North-Holland.

Derrida, J.:

1967. De la grammatologie. Paris, Minuit.

1972. La dissémination. Paris, Seuil.

1978. La vérité en peinture. Flammarion, Paris.

Dijk, Teun van:

1969. Sémantique structurale et analyse thématique. Lingua, 23. 28-53.

1972a. Some aspects of text grammars. The Hague, Mouton.

1972b. On the foundations of poetics: Methodological prolegomena to a generative grammar of literary texts. Poetics, 1. 89-123.

1973. Text Grammar and Text Logic. In: Petőfi, S. J. – Rieser, Hannes (eds.): Studies in Text Grammar. Reidel, Dordrecht.

1976. Pragmatics of language and literature. North Holland, Amsterdam.

1977a. Text and context. London, Longman.

1977b. Connectives in text grammar. In: van Dijk – Petőfi (eds.): Grammars and descriptions. Berlin, de Gruyter, 11-63.

1977c. Acceptability in context. In: Greenbaum (ed.): Acceptability in language. The Hague, Mouton, 39-61.

1978. Facts: The organization of proposition in discourse comprehension. Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam Institute for General Literary Studies.

1979a. The structures and functions of discourse. Lectures at the University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras.

1979b. Macro-structures. Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum.

1980a. Textwissenschaft. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

1980b. Macrostructures. An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

1981. Studies in the pragmatics of discourse. The Hague, Mouton.

1982. Episodes as units of discourse analysis. In: D. Tannen (ed.): Analyzing Discorse: Text and Talk. Georgetown University Press, Washington. D. C. 177-195.

1985. Introduction: Discourse Analysis as a New Cross-Discipline. In: T. A. van Dijk (ed.): 1985a. 1–10.

1988a. Social cognition, social power and social discourse. Text, 8. 1-2. 129-157.

1988b. News as Discourse. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale. N. J.

1990. The future of the field: discourse analysis in the 1990s. Text 10. 1-2. 133-156.

Dijk, Teun van (ed.):

1997a. Discourse as Structure and Process. Discourse Studies 1. SAGE Publications, London.

1997b. Discourse as Social Action. Discourse Studies 2. SAGE Publications, London.

1985a. Handbook of Discourse Analysis 1-4. Academic Press, London.

1985b. Discourse and Communication. New Approaches to the Analysis of Mass Media. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

1985c. Discourse and literature: new approaches to the analysis of literary genres. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Dijk, Teun van – Ihwe, Jens –Petőfi, János S. –Rieser, Hannes:

1972. Zur Bestimmung narrativer Strukturen auf der Grundlage von Textgrammatiken. Hamburg, Buske.

Dijk, Teun van – Kintsch, Walter:

1978. Cognitive psychology and discourse: Recalling and summarizing stories. In: Dressler (ed.): Current trends in text linguistics. Berlin, de Gruyter, 61-80.

1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. Academic Press, London.

Dijk, Teun van – Petőfi, János S. (eds.):

1977. Grammars and descriptions. Berlin, de Gruyter.

Dik, Simon:

1968. Coordination. Amsterdam, North Holland.

Dillon, George:

1978. Language processing and the reading of literature. Bloomington, Indiana UP.

Dirven, R. (ed.):

1989. A user’s grammar of English: Word, sentence, text, interaction. Frankfurt, Lang.

Dirven, R. – Fried, V. (eds.):

1987. Functionalism in linguistics. Amsterdam, Benjamins.

Dittmar, Norbert:

1976. A critical survey of sociolinguistics. New York, St. Martin’s.

Doležel, Lubomir – Bailey, Richard (eds.):

1969. Statistics and style. New York, American Elsevier.

Dorfmüller-Karpusa, Kathi:

1983. Temporalität, Theorie und Allgemeinwissen in der Textinterpretation. Eine Sprachübergreifende. Hamburg, Buske.

1984. Text-constitive connective relations and their manifestation. In: H. Krenn – J. Niemeyer – U. Eberhardt (Hg.): Sprache und Text. Niemeyer. Tübingen, 141-151.

Dorfmüller-Karpusa, K. – Petőfi, J. S. (Hg.):

1981. Text, Kontext, Interpretation. Einige Aspekte der texttheoretischen Forschung. Mit eninem Appendix Diverser Bibliographien. Hamburg, Buske.

Dorval, B.:

1990. Conversational organization and its development. Norwood, N. J. Ablex.

Dorval, B. (ed.):

1989. Conversational coherence and its development. Norwood, N. J. Ablex.

Dougherty, Ray:

1969. An interpretive theory of pronominal reference. Foundations of Language, 5. 488-519.

1970-71. A grammar of coordinating conjoined structures. Language, 46. 850-898; 47. 298-339.

Downing, P. – Noonan, M. (eds.):

1995. Word order in discourse. Amsterdam, Benjamins.

Dowty, David:

1972. Studies in the logic of verb aspect and time reference in English. Austin, University of Texas.

Dresher, Elan – Hornstein, Norbert:

1976. On some supposed contributions of artificial intelligence to the scientific study of language. Cognition, 4. 321-398.

Dressler, Wolfgang:

1970. Textsyntax und Übersetzung. In: Hartmann, Peter – Vernay, Henri (eds.): Sprachwissenschaft und Ubersetzen. München, Hueber, 64-71.

1972a. Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen, Niemeyer.

1972b. Textgrammatische Invarianz in Ubersetzungen? In: Gülich – Raible (eds.): Textsorten. Frankfurt, Athenäum, 98-106.

1974a. Funktionelle Satzperspektive und Texttheorie. In: Daneš (ed.): Papers on functional sentence perspective. Prague, Academia, 87-105.

1974b. Der Beitrag der Textlinguistik zur Übersetzungstheorie. In: Völker Kapp (ed.): Übersetzer und Dolmetscher. Heidelberg, Quelle und Meyer, 61-71.

1977. Elements of a polycentristic theory of word formation. Wiener linguistische Gazette, 15. 13-32.

1978. Aspekte der Textlinguistik. In: Germanistik II. Wien, Österreichischer Bundesverlag, 23-37.

1979a. Zum Verhältnis von Wortbildung und Textlinguistik. In: Petőfi (ed.): Text versus sentence: basic questions in text linguistics. Hamburg, Buske

1979b. Naturalness as a principle in genetic and typological linguistics. Vienna, University of Vienna Institute for Language Studies.

1992. Between grammar and discourse. In: M. Pütz (ed.): Thirtyb Years of Linguistic Evolution. Studies in Honor of René Dirven on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 149-159.

1999. Textlinguistik und die Isolierung der Grammatik von Pragmatik und Diskurs. In: Fürbeth, F. – Krügel, P. – Metzner, E. E. – Müller, O. (Hrsg.): Zur Geschichte und Problematik der Nationalphilologien in Europa. Tübingen, Niemeyer, 823-832.

Dressler, Wolfgang (ed.):

1978. Current trends in text linguistics. Berlin, de Gruyter.

Dressler, Wolfgang – Schmidt, Siegfried (eds.):

1973. Textlinguistik: Kommentierte Bibliographie. München, Fink.

Dressler, Wolfgang – Stark, Jacqueline:

1976. Störungen der Textkompetenz bei Aphasie. In:Meid, Wolfgang –Heller, Karin (eds.): Textlinguistik und Semantik. Innsbruck, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, 265-268.

Dressler, W. – Wodak, R. (Hg.):

1984. Normale und Abweichende Texte. Studien zur Bestimmung und Abgrezung von Textstörungen. Hamburg, Buske.

Drew, Paul:

1985. Analyzing the use of language in courtroom interaction. In: T. A. van Dijk (ed.): Handbook of Discourse Analysis 1-4. Academic Press, London, 3. 133-147.

1990. Conversation analysis: who needs it? Text, 10. 1-2. 27-35.

Dundes, Alan:

1962. From etic to emic units in the structural study of folktales. Journal of American Folklore, 75. 95-105.

Duranti, Alessandro:

1985. Sociocultural dimensions of discourse. In: T. A. van Dijk (ed.): Handbook of Discourse Analysis 1-4. Academic Press, London, 1. 193-230.

1997. Polyphonic discourse: Overlapping in Samoan ceremonial greetings. Text, 17. 3. 349-381.

Dure, Mark:

1994. A case study of pragmatic linking. Text, 14. 4. 495-529.

Eco, Umberto:

1962. Opera aperte: forma e indeterminatione nelle poetiche contemporanee. Bompiani, Milano.

1972. Einführung in die Semiotik. W. Fink, München.

1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

1984. Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

Edmonson, Jerry:

1976. Semantics, games and anaphoric chains. In: Bartsch, Renate et al. (eds.): Amsterdam Papers on Formal Grammars. Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam.

Eemeren, F. H. van – Grootendorst, R. (eds.):

1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht, Foris.

Eemeren, F. H. van et al (eds.):

1987. Argumentation: analysis and practices. Dordrecht, Foris.

Egli, U. – Pause, P. E. – Schwarze, Ch. – Stechow, A. von – Wienold, G. (eds.):

1995. Lexical knowledge in the organization of language. Amsterdam, Benjamins.

Ehlich, Konrad:

1985. School discourse as dialogue? In: M. Dascal (ed.): Dialogue. An Interdisciplinary Approach. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 383-411.

Ehrich, Veronlka:

1992. Hier und Jetzt. Studien zur temporalen und lokalen Deixis. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

Eikmeyer, Hans-Jürgen:

1980. Transformationsgrammatiken mit Multilabels. Definition und Anwendungsmöglichkeiten. Hamburg, Buske.

1983. Procedural analysis of discourse. Text, 3. 1. 11-38.

Eikmeyer, Hans-Jürgen – Heydrich, Wolfgang –Petőfi, J. S. (eds.):

1980. Some aspects of formal foundations in text semantics. Bielefeld, Universität.

Eikmeyer, Hans-Jürgen – Jansen, L. M. (Hg.):

1980. Objektargumente. Grundelemente der semantischen Struktur von Texten. Hamburg, Buske.

Eikmeyer, Hans-Jürgen – Rieser, Hannes:

1979. Vagheitstheorie. Bielefeld, University of Bielefeld Faculty of Linguistics.

1981. Words, Worlds, and Contexts. Berlin, de Gruyter.

Eisenstadt, Marc – Kareev, Yaakov:

1975. Aspects of human problem solving: The use of internal representations. In: Norman, Donald et al.: Explorations in cognition. San Francisco, Freeman, 308-346.

Engel, Dorothea:

1977. Textexperimente mit Aphatikern. Tübingen, Narr.

Enkvist, Nils Erik:

1973. Linguistic stylistics. The Hague, Mouton.

1978. Stylistics and Text Linguistics. In: W. U.Dressler (ed.): Current Trends in Textlinguistics. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 174–190.

1990. Seven problems in the study of coherence and interpretability. In: U. Connor – A. M.Johns (Eds.): Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives. 9-28. Washington, DC: TESOL.

Enkvist, Nils Erik (ed.):

1985. Coherence and composition: a symposium. Abo, Abo Akademi.

Enkvist, N. E. – Spencer, J. – Gregory, M. J. (eds.):

1964. Linguistics and Style. Longman, London.

Erickson, F.:

1990. The Social Construction of Discourse Coherence in a Family Dinner Table Conversation. In: B. Dorval (szerk.): Conversational organization and its development. Norwood, Ablex, 207-238.

Ermert, Karl:

1979. Briefsorten. Untersuchungen zu Theorie und Empirie der Textklassifikation. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

Ernst, George – Newell, Allan:

1969. GPS: A case study in problem solving. New York, Academic.

Eroms, H. W.:

1986. Funktionale Satzperspektive. Tübingen, Niemeyer.

Ervin-Tripp, Susan:

1972. On sociolinguistic rules: Altemation and co-occurrence. In: Gumperz – Hymes (eds.): Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 213-250.

Fahlman, Scott:

1977. A system for representing and using real-world knowledge. Cambridge, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Technical report 450.

Fakhri, Ahmed:

1998. Narration in journalistic and legal discourse. Text, 18. 4. 445-465.

Fanselow, G. – Felix, S. W.:

1993. Sprachtheorie. Tübingen, Francke Verlag.

Fant, Lars M. –Grindsted, Annette:

1995. Responses to value mismatch in intercultural negotiation interaction. Text, 15. 4. 561-588.

Felix, S. W. – Habel, C. – Rickheit, G. (eds.):

1993. Kognitive Linguistik: Repräsentation und Prozesse. Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag.

Felix, Sascha W. –Kanngießer, Siegfried –Rickheit, Gert (Hg.):

1990. Sprache und Wissen. Studien zur Kognitiven Linguistik. Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag.

Fasold, Ralph:

1992. Linguistics and grammatics. In: M. Pütz (ed.): Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution. Studies in Honor of René Dirven on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 161-176.

Feyerabend, Paul:

1978. Der wissenschaftstheoretische Realismus und die Autorität der Wissenschaften. Brunswick, Vieweg.

Figge, Udo:

1971. Syntagmatik, Distribution und Text. In: Stempel (ed.): Beiträge zur Textlinguistik. München, Fink, 159-174.

Fiehler, R.:

1990. Kommunikation und Emotion. Theoretische und empirische Untersuchungen zull Rolle von Emotionen in der verbalen Interaktion. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.

Fillmore, Charles:

1968. The case for case. In: Bach, Emmon – Harms, Robert (eds.): Universals in linguistic theory. New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1-88.

1975. An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In Proceedings of the first annual meeting of the Berkley Linguistic Society. Berkeley, University of California Institute of Human Learning, 123-131.

1977. The case for case reopened. In: Cole – Sadock (eds.): Syntax and semantics VIII: Grammatical relations. New York, Academic, 59-81.

1985. Linguistics as a tool for discourse analysis. In: T. A. van Dijk (ed.): Handbook of discourse analysis 1-4. Academic Press, London. 1. 11-39.

De Fina, Anna:

1995. Pronominal choice, identity, and solidarity in political discourse. Text, 15. 3. 379-410.

Findler, Nicholas {ed.):

1979. Associative networks: representation and use of knowledge in computers. New York, Academic.

Fine, G. A.:

1985. Rumors and gossiping. In: T. A. van Dijk (ed.): Handbook of Discourse Analysis 1-4. Academic Press, London, 3. 223-237.

Finke, Peter:

1979. Grundlagen einer linguistischen Theorie: Empirie und Begrüdung in der Sprachwissenschaft. Brunswick, Vieweg.

Firbas, Jan:

1962. Notes on the function of the sentence in the act of communication. Sborník Prací Filozofické Fakulty Brnenské Univerzity: Rada Jazykovedena, 9. 133-47.

1964. Non-thematic subject in contemporary English. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague, 2. 267-280.

1968. On the prosodic features of the modern English finite verb as means of functional sentence perspective. Brno Studies in English, 7. 11-47.

1975. On the thematic and the non-thematic section of the sentence. In: Ringbom, Hakon, et al. (eds.): Style and text: Studies presented to Nils-Erik Enkvist. Stockholm, Skriptor, 317-334.

Firth, John:

1957. A synopsis of linguistic analysis. In: Studies in linguistic analysis. Oxford, Blackwell, 1-32.

Fish, Stanley E.:

1975. Literatur im Leser: Affektive Stilistik. In: R.Warning (Hg.): Rezeptionsästhetik. Theorie und Praxis. Fink, München, 196–227.

Fisher, S. – Todd, A. (eds.):

1986. Discourse and institutional authority: medicine, education, and law. Norwood, N. J. Ablex.

Fishman, Joshua A.:

1972. Domains and relationship between micro- and macrosocio-linguistics. In: Gumperz – Hymes (eds.): Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 435-453.

Fishman, Joshua A. (ed.):

1968. Readings in the Sociology of Language. Mouton, The Hague, Paris.

Flower, Linda – Hayes, John Richard:

1979. A process model of composition. Pittsburgh, Carnegie-Mellon University Document Design Project Technical report 1.

Flowerdew, John:

1999. Face in cross-cultural political discourse. Text, 19. 1. 3-23.

Fluck, H.-R.:

1991. Fachsprachen. Einführung und Bibliographie. Francke Verlag, Tübingen.

Fludernik, Monika:

1993. The fictions of language and the languages of fiction: the linguistic representation of speech and consciousness. London, Routledge.

Fodor, Jerry:

1984. The modularity of mind. Cambridge, Massachussettes.

Fodor, Jerry – Garrett, Merrill:

1967. Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity. Perception and Psychophysics 2. 289-296

Foltz, Peter W. – WalterKintsch – Thomas K. Landauer:

1998. The Measurement of Textual Coherence With Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25. 2/3. 285-308.

Ford, Cecilia E:

1994. Dialogic aspects of talk and writing: because on the interactive-edited continuum. Text, 14. 4. 531-554.

Fordyce, R. –Marello, C. (eds.):

1994. Semiotics and linguistics Alice’s worlds. Hamburg, Buske.

Foucault, Michel:

1966. Les mots et les choses. Editions Gallimard, Paris.

1971. Die Ordnung der Dinge. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.

Fowler, Roger:

1977. Cohesive, progressive, and localizing aspects of text structure. In: van Dijk – Petőfi (eds.): Grammars and descriptions. Berlin, de Gruyter, 64-84.

1981. Literature as social discourse. London, Batsford.

1985. Power. In: T. A. van Dijk (ed.): Handbook of Discourse Analysis 1-4. Academic Press, London, 4. 61-82.

Fox, B. A. (szerk.):

1996. Studies in anaphora. Philadelphia, John Benjamins.

Frake, Charles:

1972. Struck by speech: the Yakan concept of litigation. In: Gumperz – Hymes (eds.): Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 106-129.

Franck, Dorothea:

1979. Grammatik und Konversation: Stilistische Progmatik des Dialogs und die Bedeutung deutscher Modalpartikeln. Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam Faculty of Letters.

Franke, Wilhelm:

1990. Elementare Dialogstrukturen: Darstellung, Analyse, Diskussion. Niemeyer , Tübingen.

Frawley, William:

1987. Text and epistemology. Norwood, N. J. Ablex.

1992. Linguistic Semantics.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale.

Frederiksen, Carl:

1977. Semantic processing unit in understanding text. In: Freedle (ed.): Discourse production and comprehension. Norwood, N. J. Ablex, 57 88.

1986. Cognitive models and discourse analysis. Written Communication Annual, 1. 227-268.

Freedle, Roy (ed.):

1977. Discourse production and comprehension. Norwood, N. J. Ablex.

1979. New directions in discourse processing. Norwood, N. J. Ablex.

Freedle, Roy – Hale, Gordon:

1979. Acquisition of new comprehension schemata for expository prose by transfer of a narrative schema. In: Freedle (ed.): New directions in discourse processing. Norwood, N.J. Ablex, 121-135.

Freedle, R. – Duran, R. (eds.):

1987. Cognitive and linguistic analyses of text performance. Norwood, N. J. Ablex.

Freeman, D. C. (ed.):

1970. Linguistics and literary style. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

Fretheim, Th. – Gundel, J. K. (eds.):

1996. Reference and referent accessibility. Amsterdam, Benjamins.

Fries, P. H.:

1992. Lexico-Grammatical Patterns and the Interpretation of Texts. Discourse Processes, 15. 1. 73-91.

Fries, Udo:

1972. Textlinguistik. Linguistik und Didaktik, 7. 219-234.

1975. Studien zur Textlinguistik: Frage- und Antwortsätze. Wien, Braumüller.

Fritsche, John (Hg.):

1981. Konnektivausdrücke, Konnektiveinheiten, Grundelemente der semantischen Struktur von Texten. Hamburg, Buske.

Fritz, G. – Hundsnurscher, F. (Hrsg.):

1994. Handbuch der Dialoganalyse. Tübingen, Niemeyer.

Gadamer, H-G.:

1976. Philosophical hermeneutics. University of California Press, Berkeley.

Gafaranga, Joseph:

1999. Language choice as a significant aspect of talk organization: The orderliness of language alteration. Text, 19. 2. 201-225.

Gallina, S.:

1992. Cohesion and the systemic-functional approach to text: applications to political speeches and significance for simultaneous interpretation. The Interpreter’s Newsletter, 4. 62-71.

Garcia-Berrio, A.:

1992. A theory of the literary text. Hamburg, Buske.

Garfield, J. L. (ed.):

1987. Modularity in knowledge representation and natural language understanding. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.

Garfinkel, Harold:

1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

Garrod, Simon:

1995. Distinguishing between Explicit and Implicit Focus during Text Comprehension. In: G. Rickheit – C. Habel (eds.): Focus and Coherence in Discourse Processing. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1-17.

Garton, A. F.:

1992. Social interaction and the development of language and cognition. Hove, Erlbaum.

Garvin, Paul (ed.):

1964. A Prague school reader on aesthetics, literary structure, and style. Washington, D.C. Georgetown UP.

Gazdar, G.:

1979. Pragmatics, implicature, presupposition and logical form. Academic Press, New York.

Geluykens, R.:

1992. From discourse to grammatical construction: On left dislocation in English. Amsterdam, Benjamins.

Genette, Gérard:

1966. Figures. I. Seuil. Paris.

1972. Figures. III. Seuil. Paris.

1980. Narrative discourse. An essay in method. Ithaca, New York.

Genot, G.

1979. Elements of narrativics. Grammar in narrative, narrative in grammar. Hamburg, Buske.

Gernsbacher, M. A.:

1990. Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, Erlbaum.

Gernsbacher, M. A. – Givón, T. (eds.):

1995. Coherence in spontaneous text. Amsterdam, Benjamins.

Gibbon, Daffyd:

1987. Intonation and Discourse. In: Petőfi S. J. (ed.): Text and Discourse Constitution. Empirical Aspects, Theoretical Aspects. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 3-25.

Gibbon, Daffyd – Richter, Helmut (eds.):

1984. Intonation, Accent and Rhythm. Studies in Discourse Phonology. Walter de Gruyter , Berlin, New York.

Gibbs, Raymond:

1994. The poetics of mind: figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Giora, Rachel:

1983. Functional Paragraph Perspective. In: J. S. Petőfi – E. Sözer (eds.): Micro and Macro Connexity of Texts.Buske, Hamburg, 153-182.

Givón, Talmy:

1979. On understanding grammar. Academic Press, New York.

1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse: The Functional Domain of Switch-Reference. In: I. Heiman – P. Munro (eds.): Switch-Reference and Universal Grammar. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 51-82.

1984. Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia.

1989. Mind, Code and Context. Essays in Pragmatics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale.

1992. The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics, 30. 5-55.

1995. Coherence in text vs. coherence in mind. In: M. A. Gernsbacher – T. Givón (eds.): Coherence in Spontaneous Text. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 59-115.

Givón, Talmy (ed.):

1979. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 12. Discourse and Syntax. Academic Press, New York.

Gleitman, Lila:

1965. Coordinating conjunctions in English. Language 41. 260-293.

Glinz, Hans:

1973. Textanalyse und Verstehenstheorie. Wiesbaden, Athenaion.

Goffman, Erving:

1967. Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. Harmondsworth, Penguin.

1972. Strategic interaction. New York, Ballantine.

1974. Frame analysis. New York, Harper and Row.

1981. Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

Goldberg, J. A.:

1983. A move toward describing conversational coherence. In: Craig, R. T. – Tracy, K. (eds.): Conversational coherence. Form, structure and strategy. London, Sage, 25-45.

Goldenberg, Claude – GenevievePatthey-Chavez:

1995. Discourse Processes in Instructional Conversations: Interactions Between Teacher and Transition Readers. Discourse Processes, 19. 1. 57-74.

Golder, Caroline – PierreCoirier:

1994. Argumentative Text Writing: Developmental Trends. Discourse Processes, 18. 2. 187-210.

Goldman, Neil:

1975. Conceptual generation. In: Schank et al.: Conceptual information processing. Amsterdam, North-Holland 289-371.

Goldman, Neil – Balzer, Robert –Wile, David:

1977. The inference of domain structure from informal process descriptions. Marina del Rey: University of Southern Califomia Information Sciences Institute, Technical report 77-64.

Goldman, S. R.,Saul, E. U. –Coté, N.:

1995. Paragraphing, reader, and task effects on discourse comprehension. Discourse Processes, 2., 273-305.

Goldstein, Ira – Papert, Seymour:

1977. Artificial intelligence, language, and the study of knowledge. Cognitive Science, 1. 84-123.

Gomulicki, Bronislaw:

1956. Recall as an abstractive process. Acta Psychologica, 12. 77-94.

Goodglass, Harold – Blumstein, Sheila:

1973. Psycholinguistics and aphasia. Baltimore, John Hopkins UP.

Goodman, Kenneth – Burke, Carolyne:

1973. Theoretically based studies of patterns of miscues in oral reading peiformance. Washington, D.C. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

Goutsos, Dionysis:

1996. A model of sequential relations in expository text. Text, 16. 4. 501-533.

Graesser, A. C. (ed.):

1985. Structures and Procedures of implicit knowledge. Norwood, N. J. Ablex.

Graesser, A. C. – Bower, G. H. (eds.):

1990. Inferences and text comprehension. San Diego, Academic Press.

Green, Georgia:

1968. On „too” and „either” and not just „too” and „either” either. Fourth Proceedings from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 22-39.

Greenbaum, Sidney:

1973. Informant elicitation of data on syntactic variation. Lingua, 31. 201-212.

Greenbaum, Sidney (ed.):

1977. Acceptability in language. The Hague, Mouton.

Greenberg, Joseph (ed.):

1966. Universals of Language. MIT. Cambridge, Massachussettes.

Greimas, Algirdas:

1966. Sémantique structurle: Recherches de méthode. Paris, Larousse.

1967. La structure des actants du récit: Essai d’approche générative. Word, 23. 221-238.

1972. Systématique des isotopies. In: Greimas (ed.): Essais de sémiotique poétique. Larousse. Paris.

Grenoble, L. – Riley, M.:

1996. The role of deictics in discourse coherence: French voici/voilá and Russian vot/von. Journal of Pragmatics, 25. 819-838.

Grice, Paul:

1971. Meaning. In: Steinberg – Jakobovits (eds.): Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics, and psychology. Cambridge, England, Cambridge UP. 53-59.

1975. Logic and conversation. In: Cole – Morgan (eds.): Syntax and semantics III: Speech acts. New York, Academic, 41-58.

1978. Further notes on logic and conversation. In: Cole (ed.): Syntax and semantics lX: Pragmatics. New York, Academic, 113-127.

1989. Stuies in the way of words. Cambridge, Mass. Harward University Press.

Grimes, Joseph:

1964. Huichol syntax. The Hague, Mouton.

1975. The thread of discourse. The Hague, Mouton.

Grimes, Joseph (ed.):

1978. Papers on discourse. Dallas, Summer Institute of Linguistics.

Grimshaw, A.:

1989. Collegial discourse: Professional conversation among peers. Norwood, N. J. Ablex.

1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.

Groeben, Norbert:

1978. Die Verständlichkeit von Unterrichtstexten. Münster, Aschendorff.

Grosse, Ernst-Ulrich:

1976. Texttypen: Linguistik nichtliterarischer Kommunikation. Freiburg, University of Freiburg dissertation.

1978. French structuralist views on narrative grammar. In: Dressler (ed.): Current trends in text linguistics. Berlin, de Gruyter, 155-173.

Grossman, Robin – San, James –Vance, Timothy (eds.):

1975. Papers of the parasession on functionalism. Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society.

Grosz, Barbara:

1977. The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding. Menlo Park, Stanford Research Institute, 333 Ravenswood Ave, Menlo Park, California, 94025, Artificial Intelligence, Technical report 151.

Gruber, Helmut:

1998. Disagreeing: Sequential placement and internal structure of disagreements in conflict episodes. Text, 18. 4. 467-503.

Gu Yang:

1997. On defining causativity and the significance of discourse information. Text, 17. 4. 435-455.

Guiraud, Paul:

1970. Problemes et méthodes de la stilistique. Paris.

Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich – Pfeiffer, Ludwig K. (Hg.):

1986. Stil. Geschichten und Funktionen eines kulturwissenschaftlichen Diskurselements. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.

Gumperz, John J.:

1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge.

Gumperz, John J. (ed.):

1982. Language and Social Identity. Cambridge University Press.

Gumperz, John J. – MargaretField:

1995. Children’s Discourse and Inferential Practices in Cooperative Learning. Discourse Processes, 19. 1. 133-148.

Gumperz, John – Hymes, Dell (eds.):

1972. Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Gunter, Richard:

1963. Elliptical sentences in American English. Lingua, 12. 137-150.

Gülich, Elizabeth:

1970. Makrosyntax der Gliederungssignale im gesprochenen Französisch. München, Fink.

1986. Textsorten in der Kommunikationspraxis. In: W.Kallmeyer (Hg.): Kommunikationstypologie. Handlungsmuster, Textsorten, Situationstypen. Schwann, Düsseldorf, 15–46.

Gülich, E. – Heger, K. –Raible W.:

1974. Linguistische Taxtanalyse. Überlegungen zur Gleiderung von Texten. Hamburg, Buske.

Gülich, Elizabeth – Raible, Wolfgang:

1977. Linguistische Textmodelle. München, Fink.

Habel, Christopher – Kanngieber, Siegfried – Rickheit, Gert:

1996. Thesen zur Kognitiven Linguistik. In: Ch. Habel – S. Kanngieber, G. Rickheit (Hg.): Perspektiven der Kognitiven Linguistik. Modelle und Methoden. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 15-23.

Habermas, Jürgen:

1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

1985. Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

Haenggi, Dieter – WalterKintsch – Morton AnnGernsbacher:

1995. Spatial Situation Models and Text Comprehesion. Discourse Processes, 19. 2. 173-200.

Haiman, John:

1985. Natural Syntax. Iconicity and Erosion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Haiman, J. – Tomphson, A. S.:

1988. Clause combining in grammar and discourse. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia.

Halliday, Michael:

1964. The linguistic study of literary texts. In: Lunt (ed.): Proceedings of the ninth international congress of linguistics. The Hague, Mouton, 302-307.

1967. Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague, Mouton.

1967-68. Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics, 3. 37-81; 3. 199-244; 4. 179-215.

1968. The users and uses of language. In: J. A. Fishman (ed.): Readings in the Sociology of Language. Mouton, The Hangue, 139-169.

1970. Language structure and language function. In: J. Lyons (ed.): New Horizons in Linguistics. Penguin Books, London, 140-165.

1973. Explorations in the functions of language. Edward Arnold, London.

1976. System and function in language. London, Oxford.

1978. Language as a social semiotic. The social interpretation of language and meaning. University Park Press, London, Baltimore.

1985a. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold, London.

1985b. Dimensions of discourse analysis: Grammar. In: T. A. van Dijk (ed.): Handbook of Discourse Analysis 1-4. Academic Press, London, 2. 29-55.

1989. Spoken and Written Language. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Halliday, Michael – Hasan, Ruqaiya:

1976. Cohesion in English. London, Longman.

Hallidaj, M. – Martin, J. R. (eds.):

1981. Readings in systemic linguistics. Batsford Academic and Educational LTD.

Hankamer, Jorge – Sag, Ivan:

1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 7. 391-428.

Hansen-Love, Aage:

1978. Der russische Formalismus: Rekonstruktion seiner Entwicklung aus dem Prinzip der Veifremdung. Wien, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.

Harris, D. P.:

1990. The use of ’organizing sentences’ in the structure of paragraphs in science textbooks. In: U. Connor – A. M. Johns (eds.), Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives. 67-86. Washington, DC: TESOL.

Harris, W. V.:

1988. Interpretative acts: in search of meaning. Oxford, Claredon Press.

Harris, Zellig:

1951. Methods in structural linguistics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

1952. Discourse analysis. Language, 28. 1-30, 474-494.

1963. Discourse analysis reprints. The Hague, Mouton.

Hartland, N. G.:

1994. Ways of Describing: Assessing, Categorizing, and Discourse Analysis. Discourse Processes, 17. 3. 407-420.

Hartmann, Peter:

1963a. Theorie der Grammatik. The Hague, Mouton.

1963b. Theorie der Sprachwissenschaft. Assen, van Gorcum.

1970. Aufgaben und Perspektiven der Linguistik. Konstanz, University of Konstanz Press.

1975. Textlinguistische Tendenzen in der Sprachwissenschaft. Folia Linguistica, 8. 1-49.

1979. Text und Satz. In: Petőfi (ed.): Text versus sentence: basic questions in text linguistics. Hamburg, Buske.

Hartmann, P. –Rieser, H. (eds.):

1974. Angewandte Textlinguistik. Hamburg, Buske.

Hartmann, R. R. K.:

1980. Contrastive textology. Comparative discourse analysis in applied linguistics. Julius Gross Verlag, Heidelberg.

Hartung, Wilhelm:

1983. Sprache und Kommunikation. In: W.Flescher et al. (Hg.): Deutsche Sprache. Kleine Enzyklopädie. Lepzig.

Harweg, Roland:

1968. Pronomina und Textkonstitution. München, Fink.

1970. Phrasale „und”-Koordination in der generativen Grammatik. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, 23. 192-214.

1974. Textlinguistik. In: Koch, Walter (ed.): Perspektiven der Linguistik II. Stuttgart, Kroner, 88-116.

1978. Substitutional text linguistics. In: Dressler (ed.): Current trends in text linguistics. Berlin, de Gruyter, 247-260.

1980. Beginning a text. Discourse Processes, 3. 4. 316-326.

Hasan, Ruqaiya:

1968. Grammatical cohesion in spoken and written English. London, Longman.

1984. Coherence and cohesive harmony. In: J.Flood (ed.). Understanding reading comprehension. 181-219. Delaware, International Reading Association.

Hasan, R. – Fries, P. H. (eds.):

1995. On subject and theme: a discourse functional perspective. Amsterdam, Benjamins.

Hasan, R. – Martin, J. (eds.):

1989. Language development: Learning language, learning culture. Norwood, N. J. Ablex.

Haskell, Jocellyn:

1973. In search of the Gennan pro-verb. Language Sciences, 25. 41-45.

Hatch, E.:

1992. Discourse and Language Education. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Hauser, M. D.:

1996. The evoluation of communication. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.

Hayes, Philip:

1977. Some association-based techniques for lexical disambiguation by machine. Rochester, University of Rochester Department of computer science(s) technical report 25.

Hayes-Roth, Barbara – Hayes-Roth, Frederick:

1977. The prominence of lexical information in memory representations of meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 16. 119-136.

Haynes, John:

1989. Introducing stylistics. Unwin Hyman, London.

Heger, Klaus:

1976. Monem, Wort, Satz, und Text. Tübingen, Niemeyer.

Heger, K. – Petőfi, J. S. (Hg.):

1977. Kasustheorie, Klassifikation, semantische Interpretation. Beiträge zur Lexikologie und Semantik. Hamburg, Buske.

Hedley, C. (ed.):

1985. Contexts of readings. Norwood, N. J. Ablex.

Heider, Fritz:

1958. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, Wiley.

Heidolph, Karl-Erich:

1966. Kontextbeziehungen zwischen Sätzen in einer generativen Grammatik. Kybernetika, 2. 274-281.

Heim, Irene:

1991. Artikel und Definitheit. In: A. von Stechow – D. Wunderlich (Hg.): Semantik/Semantics. Ein intemationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 487-535.

Heinemann, Wolfgang – Dieter,Viehweger:

1991. Textlinguistik. Eine Einführung. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

Helbig, Gerhard:

1974. Geschichte der neuren Sprachwissenschaft. Hamburg, Rowohlt.

1975. Zu Problemen der linguistischen Beschreibung des Dialogs im Deutschen. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 12. 65-80.

Hendricks, William:

1969. Three models for the description of poetry. Journal of Linguistics, 5. 1-22.

Heringer, James:

1970. Research on quantifier-negative idiolects. Sixth Proceedings from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 287-296.

Heritage, J.:

1985. Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In: T. A. van Dijk (ed.): Handbook of Discourse Analysis 1-4. Academic Press, London, 3. 95-117.

Herrmann, Theo:

1982. Sprechen und Situation. Eine psychologische Konzeption zur situationsspezifischen Sprachproduktion. Berlin.

1995. Allgemeine Sprachpsychologie. Grundlagen und Probleme. Psychologie Verlags Union, Weinheim.

Herskovits, Annette:

1988. Spatial Expressions and the Plasticity of Meaning. In: B. Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.): Topics in Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 271-297.

Hess, Helga:

1965. Zur Psychologie des Gedächntnisses IV: Determination und Behalten sinnvollen sprachlichen Materials bei Berücksichtigung von gestörtem Kontext. Zeitschrift fürPsychologie, 80. 152-170.

Heydrich, W.:

1981. Lexikoneinträge. Grundelemente der semantischen Struktur von Texten. Hamburg, Buske.

1982. Gegestand und Sachverhalt. Bausteine zu einer Nominalistisch Orientierten Semantik für Texte. Hamburg, Buske.

1983. Models and realities. Text, 3. 1. 99-130.

Heydrich, W.  – Neubauer, F. – PetőFi, J. S. – Sözer, E. (eds):

1989. Connexity and Coherence (Analysis of Text and Discourse). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

Heydrich, W.  – Petőfi, J. S. (Hg.):

1986. Aspekte der Konnexität und Kohärenz von Texten. Hamburg, Buske.

Hickey, Leo (ed.):

1989. The Pragmatics of Style. Routledge, London, New York.

Hickmann, M. (ed.):

1987. Social and functional approaches to Language and thought. Orlando, Academic Press.

Hill, Clifford:

1982. Up/down, front/back, left/right. A contrastive study of Hausa and English. In: J. Weissenborn – W. Klein (eds.): Here and There. Cross-linguistic Studies on Deixis and Demonstration. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 13-42.

Hillmann, Karl-Heinz:

1994. Wörterbuch der Soziologie. Kröner, Stuttgart.

Hinds, John:

1979. Organizational Patterns in Discourse. In: T. Givón (ed.): Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 12. Discourse and Syntax. Academic Press, New York, 135-157.

Hirsch, Eric Donald:

1975. Stylistics and synonymy. Critical Inquiry, 1. 559-579.

1977. The philosophy of composition. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Hobbs, Jerry:

1976. A computational approach to discourse analysis. New York, City University of New York, Department of computer science(s) technical report 76.

1979. Coherence and co-reference. Cognitive Science, 3. 67-90.

Van Hoek, Karen:

1995. Conceptual reference points: A cognitive grammar account of pronominal anaphora constraints. Language, 310-340.

Hoey, M.:

1991. Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Hollan, James:

1975. Features and semantic memory: set-theoretical or network model? Psychological Review, 82. 154-155.

Hopper, Paul J.:

1972. Aspect and Foregrounding in Discourse. In: T. Givón (ed.): Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 12. Discourse and Syntax. Academic Press, New York, 213-241.

Hölker, K.:

1981. Zur semantischen und pragmatischen Analyse von Interrogativen. Hamburg, Buske.

Hörmann, Hans:

1976. Meinen und Verstehen. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

Huddleston, Rodney:

1971. The sentence in written English: a syntactic study based on an analysis of scientific texts. London, Cambridge UP.

Hungerland, I.:

1958. Poetic discourse. Berkeley, University of California Press.

Hyland, Ken:

1998. Boosting, hedging, and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text, 18. 3. 349-382.

Hymes, Dell:

1968. The ethnography of speaking. In: J. A. Fishman (ed.): Readings in the Sociology of Language. Mouton, The Hague, 99-138.

1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

1990. Ethnopoetics. Text, 10. 1-2. 45-48.

Ihwe, Jens:

1972. Linguistik in der Literaturwissenschaft. München, Bayerischer Schulbuchverlag.

1974. On the validation of text grammar in the „Study of Literature”. Hamburg, Buske.

1976. The philosophy of literary criticism reconsidered: On the „logic” of interpretation. Poetics, 5/4. 339-372.

Ihwe, Jens (ed.):

1971. Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik: Ergebnisse und Perspektiven. Frankfurt, Athenäum.

Ihwe, Jens – Reiser Hannes:

1972. Versuch einer Exploration des „Versuchs einer Exploration der neuentdeckten Fonnelwälder von der Insel Mainau” von Werner Kummer. Linguistische Berichte, 18. 56-58.

Isacenko, Alexander:

1965. Kontextbedingte Ellipse und Pronominalisierung im Deutschen. In: Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, Volkskunde, und Literaturforschung. Berlin, Akademie, 163-173.

Isenberg, Horst:

1968. Motivierung zur „Texttheorie”. Replik, 2. 13-17.

1971. Überlegungen zur Texttheorie. In: Ihwe (ed.): Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik: Ergebnisse und Perspektiven. Frankfurt, Athenäum, 150-173.

Iser, Wolfgang:

1975. Die Wirklichkeit der Fiktion. In: Warning (ed.): Rezeptionsästhetik. München, Fink, 277-324.

1978. The act of reading: a theory of aesthetic response. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

1980. Texts and readers. Discourse process, 3. 4. 327-343.

Jackendoff, Ray:

1983. Semantics and Cognition. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusettes.

Jacobs, Geert:

1998. Projected discourse: An analysis of receiver roles in press releases. Text, 18. 4. 505-523.

Jakobson, R. – Fant, G. – Halle, M.:

1952. Preliminaries to speech analyis. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Jakobson, Roman – Jones, Lawrence:

1970. Shakespeare’s verbal art in „The expence of spirit”.The Hague, Mouton.

Jakobson, R. – Pomorska, K.:

1983. Dialogues. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Jarvella, Robert J. – LitaLundquist – JukkaHyönä:

1995. Text, Topos, and Mental Models. Discourse Processes, 20. 1. 1-28.

Jasperson, Robert –Hayashi, Makoto –Fox, Barbara:

1994. Semantics and interaction: Three exploratory case studies. Text, 14. 4. 555-580.

Jauss, Hans Robert:

1976. Literaturgeschichte als Provokation. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.

1991. Ästhetische Erfahrung und literarische Hermeneutik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.

Jaworsky, Adam:

1994. Apologies and non-apologies: Negotiation in speech act realization. Text, 14. 2. 185-206.

Jaworski, Adam – Coupland, Nikulas (eds.):

1999. The Discourse Reader. Routledge, London.

Jelitte, Herbert:

1973-74. Kommentierte Bibliographie zur Sowjetrussischen Textlinguistik. Linguistische Berichte, 28. 83-100; 29. 74-92.

Jennings, Elizabeth:

1967. Collected poems 1967. London, Macmillan.

Jespersen, Otto:

1961. A modern English grammar on historical principles. London, Allen and Unwin.

Johns, A. M.:

1990. Coherence as a cultural phenomenon: Employing ethnographic principles in the academic milieu. In: U. Connor – A. M. Johns (eds.): Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives. 209-226. Washington, DC. TESOL.

Johnson, David:

1977. On relational constrains on grammar. In: Cole – Sadock (eds.): Syntax and semantics VIII: Grammatical relations. New York, Academic, 151-78.

Johnson, David – Postal, Paul:

1980. Arc-pair grammar. Princeton, Princeton UP.

Johnson-Laird, Philip:

1977. Procedural semantics. Cognition, 5. 189-214.

1978. What’s wrong with Grandma’s guide to procedural semantics: A reply to Jerry Fodor. Cognition, 6. 249-261.

1983. Mental models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Jones, Linda:

1977. Theme in English expository discourse. Lake Bluff, III. Jupiter.

Jörg, Sabine – Hörmann, Hans:

1978. The influence of general and specific verbal labels on the recognition of labelled and unlabelled parts of pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 17.

Kallmeyer, Werner (Hg.):

1986. Kommunikationstypologie. Handlungsmuster, Textsorten, Situationstypen. Schwann, Düsseldorf.

Kallmeyer, Wemer – Klein, Wolfgang –Meyer-Herrmann, Reinhard –Netzer, Klaus –Siebert, Hans-Jürgen:

1974. Lektürekolleg zur Textlinguistik. Frankfurt, Athenäum Fischer.

Kalverkämper, H.:

1981. Orientierung zur Textlinguistik. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

Kang, M. Agnes:

1998. Strategies of inclusion: Addressee(s) in triadic exchanges. Text, 18. 3. 383-416.

Kaplan, Jeffrey:

1976. The variability of phrasal anaphoric islands. Twelfth Proceedings from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 337-350.

Karslen, Rolf:

1959. Studies in the connection of clauses in current English: zero, ellipsis , and explicit form. Bergen: Eides Boktrykkeri.

Karttunen, Lauri:

1968. What makes noun phrases definite? Santa Monica, Rand Corporation Technical report P-3871.

1969. Pronouns and variables. Fifth Proceedings from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 108-116.

1976. Discourse Referents. In: J. D. McCawley (ed.): Notes from the Linguistic Underground. Academic Press, New York, 363-385.

Katz, Jerrold – Fodor, Jerry:

1963. The structure of semantic theory. Language, 39. 170-210.

Kayser, Hermann (Hg.):

1983. Propositionen und Propositionskomplexe. Grundelemente der semantischen Struktur von Texten. Hamburg, Buske.

Keele, Steven:

1973. Attention and human peiformance. Pacific Palisades, Goodyear.

Keller-Bauer, F.:

1984. Metaphorisches Verstehen. Eine linguistische Rekonstruktion linguistischer Kommunikation. Tübingen, Niemeyer.

Keysar, Boaz:

1994. Discourse Context Effects: Metaphorical and Literal Interpretations. Discourse Processes, 18. 3. 247-270.

Kindermann, J.

1987. Experten – Parsing. Parsing und Wissensrepräsentation im texttheoretischen Rahmen. Hamburg, Buske.

Kinneavy, J. L.:

1971. Theory of Discourse. Englewood Cliffs (N.J.).

Kintsch, Walter:

1974. The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum.

1977a. Memory and cognition. New York, Wiley.

1977b. On comprehending stories. In: Just, Marcel – Carpenter, Patricia (eds.): Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum, 33-62.

1979a. Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why anyone would read a story anyway. Poetics, 9. 87-98.

1979b. Semantic memory: A tutorial. In: Nickerson, Raymond (ed.): Attention and peiformance VIII. Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum.

Kintsch, Walter – Dijk, Teun van:

1978. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85. 363-394.

Kintsch, Walter – Mandel, Theodore –Kozminsky, Ely:

1977. Summarizing scrambled stories. Memory and Cognition, 5. 547-552.

Kintsch, Walter – Vipond, Douglas:

1979. Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice. In: Nilsson, Lars-Gören (ed.): Memory: Process and problems. Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum, 329-365.

Klare, George:

1963. The measurement of readability. Ames, Iowa State University.

Klecab-Aker, J. S. – Lopez, B.:

1985. A comparison of T-units and cohesive ties used by first and third grade children. Language and Speech, 28. 307-315.

Kloepfer, Rolf:

1975. Poetik und Linguistik. München, Fink.

Knapp, M. L. – Miller, G. R. (eds.):

1985. Handbook of interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills, Sage.

Knobloch, Clemens:

1990. Zum Status und zur Geschichte des Textbegriffs. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik. Helf 77. 66-87.

Knott, A. –Dale, R.:

1994. Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 18, 35-62.

Knudson, R. E.:

1994. An analysis of persuasive discourse: Learning how to take a stand. Discourse Processes, 18, 211-230.

Koch, Walter:

1971. Taxologie des Englischen. München, Fink.

1973. Das Textem. Hildesheim, Olms.

1978. Poetizität zwischen Metaphysik und Metasprache. Poetica, 10. 285-341.

Koch, Walter (ed.):

1972. Strukturelle Textanalyse. Hildesheim, Olms.

Kohonen, Viljo – Enkvist, Nils-Erik (eds.):

1978. Text linguistics, cognitive learning, and language teaching. Abo, Finnland, Abo Akademi.

Konerding, Klaus-Peter:

1993. Frames und lexikalisches Bedeutungswissen. Untersuchungen zur linguistischen Grundlegung einer Frametheorie und zu ihrer Anwendung in der Lexikographie. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

Kopperschmidt, J.:

1985. An analysis of argumentation. In: T. A. van Dijk (ed.): Handbook of Discourse Analysis 1-4. Academic Press, London, 2. 159-168.

Konstantinidou, M.:

1997. Sprache und Gefühl. Semiotische und andere Aspekte einer Relation. Hamburg, Buske..

Koselleck, Reinhart:

1979. Vergangene Zukunft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.

Kristeva, Julia:

1968. Problemes de la structuration du texte. Linguistique et Littérature, 12. 55-64.

1969. Sémiotike: recherches pour une sémanalyse. Seuil, Paris.

1970. Le texte du roman: approche sémiologique d’une structure discoursive transformationelle. Mouton, The Hague.

1974. La révolution du langage poétique. Seuil, Paris.

1980. Desire in language. Columbia University Press, New York.

Kuhn, Thomas:

1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, University of Chicago.

Kuipers, Benjamin:

1975. A frame for frames: Representing knowledge for retrieval. In: Bobrow – Collins (eds.): Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. New York, Academic, 151-184.

Kummer, Werner:

1972. Versuch einer Exploration der neuentdeckten Formelwälder von der Insel Mainau. Linguistische Berichte, 18. 53-55.

1975. Grundlagen der Texttheorie. Hamburg, Rowohlt.

Kuno, S.:

1978. Generative discourse analysis in America. In: Dressler (ed.): Current trends in text linguistics. Berlin, de Gruyter, 275-94.

1987. Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Kurzon, Dennis:

1996. The White House speeches: Semantic and paralinguistic strategies for eliciting applause. Text, 16. 2. 199-224.

Kusch, M. – Schröder, H. (eds.):

1989. Text, interpretation, argumentation. Hamburg, Buske.

Laberge, David – Samuels, Jay (eds.):

1977. Basic processes in reading: perception and comprehension. Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum.

Labov, William:

1969. Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language, 45. 715-762.

1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.

1973. The boundaries of words and their meanings. In: Bailey, Charles – Shuy, Roger (eds.): New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington, D.C. Georgetown UP. 340-373.

Labov, William – Fanshel, David:

1977. Therapeutic Discourse. New York, Academic.

Labov, William – Waletzky, Joshua:

1967. Narrative analysis: Oral version of personal experience. In: Helm, June (ed.): Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Seattle, University of Washington Press, 12-44.

Lakoff, George:

1968. Pronouns and reference. Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club.

1971. On generative semantics. In: Steinberg – Jakobovits (eds.): Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics, and psychology. Cambridge, England, Cambridge UP. 232-296.

1973. Fuzzy grammar and the performance/competence terminology game. NinthProceedings from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 271-291.

1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. The University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. – Johnson, M.:

1980. Metaphors we live by. University Chicago Press, Chicago.

Lakoff, R.:

1975. Language and woman’s place. Harper and Row, New York.

Lambek, Joachim:

1961. On the calculus of syntactic types. In: Proceedings of symposia in applied mathematics, 12. 25-42.

Lampert, Martina:

1992. Die parenthetische Konstruktion als textuelle Strategie: zur kognitiven und kommunikativen Basis einer grammatischen Kategorie. München, Sagner.

Lang, Ewald:

1973. Über einige Schwierigkeiten beim Postulieren Einer Textgrammatik. In: F. Kiefer – N.Ruwet (eds.): Generative Grammar in Europe. Riedel, Dordrecht. 284–314.

1976. Semantik der koordinativen Verknüpfung. Berlin, Akademie der Wissenschaften.

1991. Koordinierende Konjunktionen. In: A. von Stechow – D. Wunderlich (Hg.): Semantik/Semantics. Ein intemationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 597-623.

1994. Semantische vs. konzeptuelle Struktur: Unterscheidung und Überschneidung. In: M. Schwarz (Hg.): Kognitive Semantik/Cognitive Semantics. Ergebnisse, Probleme, Perspektiven. Narr, Tübingen, 25-40.

Langacker, Ronald W.:

1985. Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In: J. Haiman (ed.): Iconicity in syntax. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 109-150.

1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I. Stanford, California.

1991a. Concept, Image, Symbol: the Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Mouton de Gruyter , Berlin, New York.

1991b. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume II. Descriptive Application. Stanford, Califomia.

1996. Conceptual Grouping and Pronominal Anaphora. In: B. Fox (ed.): Studies in Anaphora. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 333-378.

1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin, New York, Mouton de Gruyter.

Langleben, Maria:

1981. Latent coherence, contextual meanings, and the interpretation of text. Text, 1. 3. 279-313.

1983. On the Structure of Dialogue. In: J. S. Petőfi – E. Sözer (eds.): Micro and Macro Connexity of Texts. Buske, Hamburg, 220-286.

Larson, Richard:

1976. Structure and form in non-fiction prose. In: Tate (ed.): Teaching composition: Ten bibliographical essays. Fort Worth, Texas Christian UP. 47-71.

Lausberg, Heinrich:

1960. Handbuch de Literarischen Rhetorik. Hueber, München.

Lautamatti, L.:

1990. Coherence in spoken and written discourse. In: U.Connor – A. M.Johns (eds.): Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives. 29-42. Washington, DC. TESOL.

Le, Elizabeth:

199. The use of paragraphs in French and English academic writing: Towards a grammar of paragraphs. Text, 19. 3. 307-343.

Leech, Geoffrey N.:

1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London.

1990. Telling the truth about text? Text, 10. 1-2. 55-60.

Leech, Geoffrey N. – Svatrvik, Jan:

1975. A communicative grammar of English. London, Longman.

Lehiste, Ilse:

1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MIT Press.

1975. The phonetic structure of the paragraph. In: Cohen, Antonie – Nooteboom, Sibout (eds.): Structure and process in speech perception. Berlin, Springer, 195-203.

Lenat, Douglas:

1977. The ubiquity ofdiscovery. Fifth Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1093-1105.

Leodolter, Ruth:

1975. Das Sprachverhalten von Angeklagten vor Gericht. Kronberg, Scriptor.

Lerchner, G.:

1984. Sprachform von Dichtung: linguistische Untersuchungen zu Funktion und Wirkung literarischer Texte. Berlin, Aufbau-Verlag.

Levelt, Willem, et al.:

1977. Grammaticality, paraphrase, and imagery. In: Greenbaum (ed.): Acceptability in language. The Hague, Mouton, 87-102.

Levesque, Hector:

1977. A procedural approach to semantic networks. Toronto, University of Toronto, Department of computer science(s) technical report 105.

Levesque, Hector – Mylopoulos, John:

1979. A procedural semantics for semantic networks. In: Findler (ed.): Associative networks: representation and use of knowledge in computers. New York, Academic, 93-120.

Lévi-Strauss, Claude:

1958. Anthropologie structurale. Plon, Paris.

1960. La structure et la forme. Cahiers de l’Institute de Science Économique Appliquée, 99. 3-36.

Levin, James – Goldman, Neil:

1977. Process models of reference in context. Marina del Rey, University of Southern Califonia Information Sciences Institute, Artificial Intelligence Technical report 78-72.

Levin, Samuel:

1962. Linguistic structures in poetry. The Hague, Mouton.

1963. Deviation – statistical and determinate – in poetic language. Lingua, 21. 276-290.

1965. Internal and external deviation in poetry. Word, 21. 225-237.

Levinson, S. C.:

1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Levy, Jifi:

1971. Generative Poetik. In: Ihwe (ed.): Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik: Ergebnisse und Perspektiven. Frankfurt, Athenäum, 924-937.

Li, Charles (ed.):

1976. Subject and topic. New York, Academic.

Liberman, Kenneth:

1999. The social praxis of communicating meanings. Text, 19. 1. 57-72.

Liles, B. Z.:

1985. Cohesion in the narratives of normal and language-disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28. 123-133.

Linde, Charlotte – Labov, William:

1975. Spatial networks as a site for the study of language and thought. Language, 51. 924-39.

Linsky, Leonard:

1971. Reference and referents. In: Steinberg – Jakobovits (eds.): Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics, and psychology. Cambridge, England, Cambridge UP. 76-85.

Livingstone, Myra Cohn:

1972. Driving. In. The Malibu and other poems. New York, Atheneum.

Loftus, Geoffrey – Loftus, Elizabeth:

1976. Human memory: the processing of information. Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum.

Longacre, Robert:

1964. Grammar discovery procedures. The Hague, Mouton.

1970. Discourse, paragraph, and sentence structure. Santa Ana, Summer Institute of Linguistics.

1972. Hierarchy and universality of discourse constituents. Washington, Georgetown University Press.

1976. An anatomy of speech notions. Lisse, de Ridder.

1979. The Paragraph as a Grammatical Unit. In: T. Givón (ed.): Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 12. Discourse and Syntax. Academic Press, New York, 115-134.

1981. A spectrum and profile approach to discourse analysis. Text, 1. 4. 337-360.

1989. Two hypotheses regarding text generation and analysis. Discourse Processes, 12. 4. 413-459.

Longacre, R. (ed):

1984. Theory and application in processing texts in non-indoeuropean languages. Hamburg, Buske.

Lotman, Ju.:

1971. The structure of the artistic text (in Russian). Brown University Press, Providence, Rhode Island.

1972. Analysis of the poetic text. Ann Arbor, Ardis.

Lötscher, A.:

1987. Text und Thema: Studien zur thematischen Konstituenz von Texten. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

Luckmann, Thomas:

1992. Theorie des sozialen Handels. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

Luhmann, Niklas:

1984. Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemenier Theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.

Lunt, Horace (ed.):

1964. Proceedings of the ninth international congress of linguistics. The Hague, Mouton.

Lux, F.:

1981. Text, Situation, Textsorte. Günter Narr, Tübingen.

Lyons, John:

1977. Semantics. London, Cambridge.

Maleville, Mireille:

1995. Ideological values in the workplace: Denials of unstated assertions in English, French and Dutch conversations. Text, 15. 4. 503-529.

Malinowski, Bronislaw:

1923. The Problem of meaning in primitive languages. In: Ogden, Charles – Richards, Ivor: The meaning of meaning. London, Oxford, 296-336.

de Man, Paul:

1979. Allegories of Reading: figural language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke and Proust. Yale University Press, New Heaven.

Mandler, Jean:

1978. A code in the node: The use of story schema in retrieval. Discourse Processes, 1. 1. 14-35.

Mandler, Jean – Johnson, Nancy:

1977. Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9. 111-151.

Mann, W. C. –Thompson, S. A.:

1986. Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse Processes, 9. 1.57-90.

1988. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8/3, 243-281.

1992. Discourse description: diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text. Amsterdam, Benjamins.

Markkanen, R. –Schröder, H. (eds.):

1997. Hedging and discourse. Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic text. Hamburg, Buske.

Marriott, Stephanie:

1997. The emergence of live television talk. Text, 17. 2. 181-198.

Martin, J. R.:

1992. English Text. Philadelphia, John Benjamins.

1995. Text and clause: Fractal resonance. Text, 15. 1. 5-42.

Martindale, C. (ed.):

1988. Psychological approaches to the study of literary narratives. Hamburg, Buske.

Matejka, Ladislav – Pomorska, Krystyna (eds.):

1971. Readings in Russian poetics: Formalist and structuralist views. Cambridge, MIT Press.

Mathesius, Vilém:

1928. On linguistic characterology with illustrations from modern English. In: Actes du Ier Congres International des Linguistes, 56-63.

Matocsian, Greg:

1999. Intertextuality, affect, and ideology in legal discourse. Text, 19. 1. 73-109.

Mauranen, Anna:

1993. Cultural differences in academic rhetoric: a textlinguistic study. Frakfurt am Main, Lang. 

Mayerthaler, Willi:

1987. System-independent morphological naturalness. In: W. U. Dressler (ed.): Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 25-58.

McCagg, P.:

1984. An investigation of inferencing in second language reading comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.

1990. Toward understanding coherence: A response proposition taxonomy. In: U. Connor – A. M.Johns (eds.), Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives. 111-127. Washington, DC: TESOL.

McCall, William – Crabbs, Lelah:

1961. Standard test lessons in readability. New York, Columbia University Bureau of Publications.

McCarthy, M.:

1991. Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

McCarthy, M. – Carter, R.:

1994. Language as Discourse. London, Longman.

McCawley, James:

1976. Some ideas not to live by. Die neueren Sprachen, 75. 151-165.

McClelland, J. L. – RUMELHART, D. E. (eds.):

1986. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol. 2. MIT Press, Cambridge.

McCormac, E. R.:

1985. A cognitive theory of metaphor. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.

McGregor, G. – White, R. S. (eds.):

1990. Reception and response: hearer creativity and the analysis of spoken and written texts. London, Routledge.

McKeown, K. R.:

1985. Text generation: Using discourse strategies and focus constraints to generate natural language text. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

McNamara, Danielle S.– WalterKintsch:

1996. Learning From Texts: Effects of Prior Knowledge and Text Coherence. Discourse Processes, 22. 3. 247-288.

Melcsuk, Igor:

1974. Opit tyeorii lingvisztyicsesckih mogyelej „szmiszl-tyekszt”: Szemantyika, Szintakszisz. Moszkva, Nauka.

1976. Ein linguistisches Modell des Typs „Smysl-Tekst”. In: Gierke, Wolfgang – Jachnow, Helmut (eds.): Theoretische Linguistik in Osteuropa. Tübingen. Niemeyer, 49-67.

Melcsuk, Igor – Zsolkovszkij, Alekszandr:

1970. Towards a functioning meaning-text model of language. Linguistics, 57. 10-47.

Metzing, Dieter (ed.):

1979. Frame conceptions and text understanding. Berlin, de Gruyter.

1981. Dialogmuster und Dialogprozesse. Hamburg, Buske.

Meutsch, D. – Viehoff, R. (eds.):

1989. Comprehension of literary Discourse. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

Meyer, Bonnie:

1975. The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam, North Holland.

1977. What is remembered from prose: A function of passage structure. In: Freedle (ed.): Discourse production and comprehension. Norwood, N. J. Ablex, 307-336.

1979. Research on prose comprehension: Applications for composition teachers. Tempe, Arizona State University Department of Educational Psychology Prose Learning Series, Technical report 2.

Meyer-Hermann, R. – Rieser, H. (eds.):

1985. Ellipsen und fragmentarische Ausdrücke. Tübingen, Niemeyer.

Miall, David S. –Kuiken, Don:

1994. Beyond Text Theory: Understanding Literary Response. Discourse Processes, 17. 3. 337-352.

Miller, George:

1951. Language and communication. New York, McGraw-Hill.

1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two. Psychological Review, 63. 81-97.

Miller, George, Galanter, Eugene –Pribram, Karl:

1960. Plans and the structure of behavior. New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Miller, George – Johnson-Laird, Philip:

1976. Language and perception. Cambridge, Harvard UP.

Miller, Gerald – Coleman, Edmund:

1979. A set of prose passages calibrated for complexity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 6. 851-854.

Miller, T. (ed.).:

1995. Functional approaches to written text: Classroom applications. The Journal of TESOL France, 2/2. 39-60.

Millies, R. –Ostermann, F. –Vauth, Fr. (Hg.):

1986. Erschwerte Komunikation und Ihre Analyse. Hamburg, Buske.

Milroy, Lesley:

1980. Language and Social Networks. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Milroy, James –Milroy, Lesley:

1985. Authority in language. Investigating language prescription and standardization. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

Minsky, Marvin:

1975. A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston (ed.): The psychology of computer vision. New York, McGraw-Hill, 211-277.

Minsky, Marvin – Papert, Seymour:

1974. Artificial intelligence: Condon lectures. Eugene, Oregon State System of Higher Education.

Mistler-Lachman, Janet:

1974. Depth of comprehension and sentence memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 13. 98-106.

Mistník, Josef:

1973. Exakte Typologie von Texten. München, Sagner.

Mohan, Bernard:

1977. Acceptability testing and fuzzy grammar. In: Greenbaum (ed.): Acceptability in language. The Hague, Mouton, 133-148.

Molinié, Georges:

1986. Eléments de stylistique francaise. Presses Universitaires de France.

Monaghan, J. (ed.):

1987. Grammar in the construction of texts. London, Pinter.

Morales–López, Esperanza:

1995. Rhythmic elements and new/known information in spontaneous conversation. Text, 15. 1. 43-68.

Morgan, Jerry:

1978. Toward a rational model of discourse comprehension. Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing-2 New York, Association for Computing Machinery, P. O. Box 12105 Church Street Station, New York, NY 10249, 109-114.

Morgenroth, K. (Hrsg.):

1993. Methoden der Fachsprachendidaktik und -analyse: deutsche Wirtschafts- und Wissenschaftssprache. Frankfurt am Main, Lang.

Motsch, Wolfgang –Viehweger, Dieter:

1981. Sprtachhandlung, Satz und Text. In: I.Rosengren (Hg.): Sprache und Pragmatik. Lunder Symposium 1980. Malmö, 125–154.

Mounin, Georges:

1963. Les problemes théoriques de la traduction. Paris, Gallimard.

Muir, John:

1969. How to keep your Volkswagen alive: a manuel of step-by-step procedures for the compleat idiot. Berkeley, Book People.

Mulder, W. – Tasmowski, L. (eds.):

1996. Coherence and anaphora. Amsterdam, Benjamins.

Mukarovsky, Jan:

1964. Standard language and poetic language. In: Garvin (ed.): A Prague school reader on aesthetics, literary structure, and style. Washington, D.C. Georgetown UP. 17-30.

Mulholland, Joan:

1996. A series of story turns: Intertextuality and collegiality. Text, 16. 4. 535-555.

Munro, M. J. – Derwing, T. M.:

1995. Foreign Accent, Comprehensibility, and Intelligibility in the Speech of Second Language Learners. Language Learning, 45. 73-97.

Müller, R.-A.:

1991. Der (un)teilbare Geist. Modularismus und Holismus in der Kognitionsforschung. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

Myers, G.:

1991. Lexical cohesion and specialized knowledge in science and popular science texts. Discourse Processes, 14. 1-26.

Myhill, J.:

1992. Typological discourse analysis: Quantitative approaches to the study of linguistic function. Oxford, Blackwell.

Neisser, Ulric:

1967. Cognitive psychologie. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Neubauer, F.:

1980. Die Struktur der Explikationen in Deutschen Einsprachigen Wörterbüchern. Eine Vergleichende lexiko-semantische Analyse. Hamburg, Buske.

Neubauer, F. (ed.):

1983. Coherence in natural-language texts. Hamburg, Buske.

Newell, Allan – Simon, Herbert:

1972. Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice- Hall.

Nickel, Gerhard (ed.):

1971. Papers in contrastive linguistics. Cambridge, England, Cambridge UP.

1972. Reader zur Kontrastiven Linguistik. Frankfurt, Athenäum.

Nothdurft, Werner:

1986. Das Muster im Kopf? Zur Rolle von Wissen und Denken bei der Konstitution interaktiver Muster. In: Kallmeyer (Hg.): Kommunikationstypologie. Handlungsmuster, Textsorten, Situationstypen. Schwann, Düsseldorf, 92–116.

Nöth, Winfried:

1978. The semiotic framework of text linguistics. In: Dressler (ed.): Current trends in text linguistics. Berlin, de Gruyter 31-34.

1990. Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington, Indianapolis, Indiana University Press.

Nöth, W. (ed.):

1994. Origins of semiosis. Sign evolution in nature and culture. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.

Nunan, D.:

1993. Introducing Discourse Analysis. London, Penguin.

Ny, Jean-Francois le:

1979. La sémantique psychologique. Paris, French UP.

Ny, Jean-Franyois le – Denhiere, Guy:

1980. Relative importance of meaningful units in comprehension and recall of narratives by children and adults. Poetics, 9. 147-161.

O’Brien, T.:

1995. Rhetorical structure analysis and the case of the inaccurate, incoherent source-hopper. Applied Linguistics, 16/4. 442-482.

O’Connel, Daniel:

1977. One of many units: The sentence. In: Rosenberg (ed.): Sentence production: developments in research and theory. Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum, 307-313.

Oevermann, Ulrich:

1970. Sprache und soziale Herkunft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

Okolo, Bertram A.:

1995. Opening-up closings: Negotiating settlements in problematic discourse encounters. Text, 15. 2. 191-208.

Olson, David – Filby, Nikola:

1972. On the comprehension of active and passive sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 3. 161-181.

Oomen, Ursula:

1969. Systemtheorie der Texte. Folia Linguistica, 5. 12-34.

Ortony, Andrew:

1978. Remembering, understanding, and representation. Cognitive Science, 2. 53-69.

Ortony, Andrew (ed.):

1979. Metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London.

Osborne, John:

1960. Look back in anger. London, Faber and Faber.

Osgood, Charles:

1971. Where do sentences come from? In: Steinberg – Jakobovits (eds.): Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics, and psychology. Cambridge, England, Cambridge UP. 497-529.

Paduceva, Elena:

1970. Anaphoric relations and their manifestations in the text. TenthProceedings of the International Congress of Linguists, 693-697.

Paivio, Allan:

1971. Imagery and verbal processes. New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Palek, Bohumil:

1968. Cross-reference: A study from hyper-syntax. Prague, Charles UP.

Palmer, Gary B.:

1996. Toward a theory of cultural linguistics. Texas University Press, Austin.

Paltridge, B.:

1994. Genre analysis and the identification of textual boundaries. Applied Linguistics, 15/3. 288-299.

1995. Working with genre: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 24. 393-406.

Papert, Seymour:

1980. Mindstorms: Computers, children, and powerful ideas. New York, Basic Books.

Pause, Peter E.:

1991. Anaphern im Text. In: A. von Stechow – D. Wunderlich (Hg.): Semantik/Semantics. Ein intemationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 548-559.

Pavlidis, Theodosios:

1977. Structural pattern recognition. Berlin, Springer.

Van Peer, W. – Renkema, J. (eds.):

1984. Pragmatics and Stylistics. Acco, Leuven.

Pellegrini, A. D.:

1984. The effect of dramatic play on children’s generation of cohesive text. Discourse Processes, 7. 57-67.

Pellegrini A. D. – Yawkey, T. (eds.): 

1984. The development of oral and written language in social contexts. Norwood, N. J. Ablex.

Perlmutter, David – Postal, Paul:

1978. Some proposed laws of basic clause structure. Yorktown Heights, IBM J. Thomas Watson Research Centre Technical report.

Peterson, C.:

1993. Identifying Referents and Linking Sentences Cohesively in Narration. Discourse Processes, 16. 507-524.

Peterson, C. – Dodsworth, P.:

1991. A longitudional analysis of young children’s cohesion and noun specification in narratives. Journal of Child Language, 18. 397-415.

Petőfi, János S.:

1971. Transformationsgrammatiken und eine ko-textuelle Texttheorie. Frankfurt, Athenäum.

1974. Towards an empirically motivated grammatical theory of verbal texts. In: Petőfi – Rieser (eds.): Studies in text grammar. Dordrecht, Reidel, 205-275.

1975. Verse une théorie partielle du texte. Hamburg, Buske.

1976. A frame for frames: A few remarks on the methodology of semantically guided text processing. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. Berkeley, University of California Institute of Human Learning, 319-329.

1978. A formal semiotic text theory as an integrated theory of natural languages. In: Dressler (ed.): Current trends in text linguistics. Berlin, de Gruyter, 35-46.

1980. Einige Grundfragen der pragmatisch-semantischen Interpretation von Texten. In: Ballmer, Thomas – Kindt, Walter (eds.): Zum Thema Sprache und Logik: Ergebnisse einer interdisziplinären Diskussion. Hamburg, Buske, 146-190.

Petőfi, János S. – Garcia Berrio, Antonio:

1978. Lingüistica del texto y critica literaria. Madrid, Comunicación.

1990. Text linguistics and literary criticism. Tokyo, Bunkashobo-Hakubunsha, Inc.

Petőfi, János S. – Rieser, Hannes:

1974. Probleme der modelltheoretischen Interpretation von Texten. Hamburg, Buske.

Petőfi, János S. (ed.):

1978. Logic and the formal theory of natural language. Hamburg, Buske.

1979. Text versus sentence: basic questions in text linguistics. Hamburg, Buske.

1981. Text versus sentence continued. Hamburg, Buske.